Texas School Board Agrees To Stop Teaching Unconstitutional Bible Class In Public Schools (3/5/2008)
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT:
media@aclu.org; (212) 549-2666 Agreement With
Ector County School Board Will Prevent Unconstitutional Curriculum From
Being Taught ODESSA, TX
– The Ector County School Board agreed today to stop teaching a course in
its public schools that unconstitutionally promotes a particular interpretation
of the Bible that is not shared by Jews, Catholics, Orthodox Christians, and
most Protestants.
The
agreement settles a federal lawsuit filed in May 2007 that was brought by eight
Odessa parents and taxpayers who argued
that the course, created by a religious organization, violated their
constitutional right to religious liberty by promoting specific religious
doctrines to children in their community. The parents were represented by the
American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Texas, People For the American Way
Foundation and the law firm of Jenner and Block LLP.
“This
agreement is a victory for those who wish religious education to be in the hands
of parents and not public school officials,” said Dr. T. Jeremy Gunn, Director
of the ACLU’s Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. “It is
unacceptable for government officials to decide which religious beliefs are true
and which are not and then use the public school system as a means of
proselytizing children.”
The
lawsuit challenged the school board’s decision last year to teach a
controversial Bible course created by the National Council on Bible Curriculum
in Public Schools (NCBCPS), a private group that promotes its own particular
interpretation of the Bible. The NCBCPS has been criticized by recognized
biblical scholars for its religious bias and unsound scholarship.
Under the
agreement, Ector County schools may not teach the current
course after this school year. If
the board decides to offer a different Bible course in the future, the course
must follow strict legal standards for objectivity and may not be based on the
NCBCPS curriculum.
“Public
schools may offer courses about the Bible if they do so in an objective and
balanced way,” said Judith E. Schaeffer, Legal Director of People For the
American Way Foundation. “But the evidence is overwhelming that these
constitutional principles have been ignored in
Ector County schools. Students have been taught
one religious interpretation of the Bible. That’s not only violating the
Constitution, it’s also giving students a bad education.”
The
elective course was being taught in two high schools in
Odessa, Texas —
Permian High
School and
Odessa High
School.
Among
other things, the Bible course required students to give “true” or “false”
answers to questions that should be a matter of religious faith. Public
school teachers sought to promote religious life lessons by having students
memorize biblical passages and then discuss how the passages affected their
lives, the groups filing the lawsuit said. The course also presented an
unbalanced view of American history that promoted specific religious beliefs
that is in conflict with objective scholarly standards.
Douglas C.
Hildebrand, an ordained elder and deacon at a local Presbyterian Church and one
of the longtime Odessa residents who was a plaintiff in
the lawsuit, said it is inappropriate for one set of religious beliefs to be
promoted over others.
“Religion is an
essential component of my life and the life of my family, but this course did
nothing more than advocate certain religious views that are not shared by
everyone,” Hildebrand said. “It seems as though a church had invaded the
public school system - and it wasn’t my church.”
Lisa Graybill, Legal
Director for the ACLU of Texas, said sound scholarship was never the primary
objective of the course.
“This
class was never about educating students, but rather the promotion of one
particular set of religious beliefs to the exclusion of all others,” Graybill
said. “There are a number of ways in which religion’s role in society, history
and literature can be constitutionally taught to students, but that was clearly
not the objective of this particular course.”
The NCBCPS
course has been seriously criticized by Bible scholars for its lack of accuracy,
ignorance of scholarly research, and biased promotion of a particular religious
interpretation of the Bible. Although the NCBCPS defends its curriculum as
being constitutional, its own website at one time revealed a different agenda,
urging people to contact NCBCPS as a “first step to get God back in your public
school” – a designation that was removed after the lawsuit was filed.
According
to Daniel Mach, the Director of Litigation of the ACLU’s Program on Freedom of
Religion and Belief, Ector County school officials now have a much
clearer understanding of what the Constitution does and does not allow.
“The
agreement gives the school board a clear roadmap if it decides to adopt a new
course,” Mach said. “We trust that any future curriculum will be
appropriate for students of all faiths – including nonbelievers – and that it
will respect the religious liberty of all Odessans.”
A copy
of the original complaint is available online at: www.aclu.org/religion/schools/29683lgl20070516.html
Additional information about the
case and the issue of teaching about religion in public schools can be found
online at: www;.aclu.org/bibleinpublicschools
or www.pfaw.org/go/ReligiousFreedom
|