Reproductive Rights Groups Ask Appeals Court to Uphold Ruling Striking Down Michigan’s Third Attempt at a Dangerous and Extreme Ban on Abortion (10/26/2006)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.org
CINCINNATI - The American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Reproductive
Rights, and Planned Parenthood Federation of America today asked the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to uphold a lower court ruling striking down
Michigan’s third attempt at a dangerous and extreme ban on abortion. The
ban would prohibit nearly all abortions in the state and fails to provide an
adequate exception to protect women’s health.
“This law dangerously interferes with medical practice, by preventing doctors
from performing virtually all abortions, and stopping them from treating
miscarriages,” said Brigitte Amiri, a Staff Attorney for the ACLU Reproductive
Freedom Project, who argued the case before the court today. “We are
confident that the court will put women’s health care first and stop this
extreme measure from taking effect.”
In September 2005, a federal district court struck down the law in question,
the Legal Birth Definition Act, saying it “creates a ban on actions at the heart
of abortion procedures from the earliest stages of pregnancy, whether used to
perform induced abortions or to treat pregnancy loss.”
The court also found that the Act fails to include protections for women’s
health and contains an inadequate life exception.
“This ban is part of a larger anti-choice agenda to eliminate safe, legal
abortions at any cost, including unashamedly endangering women’s health and
lives,” said Sanford Cohen, Deputy Director of the domestic legal program at the
Center for Reproductive Rights. “Women, in consultation with their
doctors, not politicians, should make decisions regarding pregnancy
care.” The Michigan legislature passed the abortion ban in 2004
despite federal courts striking down two similar bans in previous years.
In June 1996, the legislature passed its first abortion ban. A year later,
a federal judge declared that ban unconstitutional because it was vague and
overbroad. Similarly in 2001, a federal judge struck down a second ban for
failing to include an exception to protect women’s health.
“Major medical organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists, oppose this ban,” said Sarah Scranton, Executive Director of
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Michigan. “It’s time for the Michigan
legislature to stop playing politics with women’s lives.
The plaintiffs in the case are Northland Family Planning Clinic, Inc., Summit
Medical Center, Planned Parenthood Mid-Michigan Alliance, Planned Parenthood of
South Central Michigan, and a group of individual physicians.
Today’s case is Northland Family v. Cox, Case Numbers 05-2417 and
05-2418. The plaintiffs are represented by Amiri and Talcott Camp of the
ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project; Michael J. Steinberg and Kary Moss of the
ACLU of Michigan; Eve Gartner and Roger Evans of Planned Parenthood Federation
of America; Sanford Cohen of the Center for Reproductive Rights; and David Nacht
of David A. Nacht, P.C. The American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the
plaintiffs.
|